asebomj.blogg.se

1. CONSTRUCTION MASTER PRO DESKTOP PERCISION 1080P
2. CONSTRUCTION MASTER PRO DESKTOP PERCISION DRIVER
3. CONSTRUCTION MASTER PRO DESKTOP PERCISION ISO
4. CONSTRUCTION MASTER PRO DESKTOP PERCISION SERIES

Testing on Sid Meier's Civilization VI shows FPS improvement of 15% (at 1440p) and 80% (at 1080p) comparing a 30.0.100.9805 driver to a 27.20.100.8587 driver on DG1 with a TGL-U platform. With Intel's graphics drivers, we have seen improvements of 15 to 80% throughput for CPU-bound titles.

CONSTRUCTION MASTER PRO DESKTOP PERCISION 1080P

Testing as of November 2020 at 1080p and low settings. First with Gen 9 to Gen 11, and then with Gen 11 to X e LP.Ĥx graphics improvement based on in-game benchmark testing of Hitman 2. We have doubled performance year over year, 2 years in a row. Intel: Peak architectural capabilities in the new Performance-core for VNNI (running on 2 wide FMAs) and AMX implementations as of August 2021Ĭompetition: Peak architectural capabilities of the Zen 3 architecture based on published architectural details as of August 2021, at With AMX, we will expand that by 8x, delivering 2048 int8 operations per cycle per core.īased on peak architectural capability of matrix multiply + accumulate operations per cycle per core assuming 100% CPU utilization That's already over 2X our x86 CPU competition. With int8, used for inference, our VNNI technology delivers 256 int8 operations per cycle per core. Intel® Core™ i9-11900k, 4x16GB 1R DDR4 UDIMM 2DPC 3200 Max Memory Frequency, Samsung 980 Pro 500GB PCIe SSD, WIN 10 20H2 圆4.789, High Performance Power Plan, 1920x1080 display resolutionĪlder Lake Desktop S801, RVP board with 2x16GB 1R DDR5 UDIMM 1DPC, 4400 Max Memory Frequency, Samsung 980 Pro 500GB PCIe SSD, WIN 10 20H2 圆4.508_​update.906, High Performance Power Plan, 1920x1080 display resolutionīased on overall scores and individual subcomponent scores on: SYSmark 25, CrossMark, PCMark 10, SPEC CPU 2017, WebXPRT 3, Geekbench 5

CONSTRUCTION MASTER PRO DESKTOP PERCISION ISO

This means that Skylake would need to consume 5 times the power for the same performance.Ĭomparing our current 11th Gen Intel Core architecture to the new Performance-core at ISO frequency shows that, on general-purpose performance, there is an average (i.e., geomean) improvement of 19%, across a wide range of existing workloads. If we compare four of our new Efficient-cores against two Skylake cores running four threads, we deliver 80% more performance while still consuming less power.Īlternatively, we deliver the same throughput while consuming 80% less power. If we compare our Efficient-core to a single Skylake core for a single logical process, we deliver the same performance while consuming less than 40% of the power.Īlternatively, a Skylake core would consume 2.5X more power to achieve the same performance as our Efficient-core. Workload: SPECrate2017_​int_​base estimates with GCC 8.1.0 -O2 binaries Internal Estimates as of Jusing internal architecture simulation. If we compare our Efficient-core to a single Skylake core for a single logical process, we deliver 40% more performance at the same power.

CONSTRUCTION MASTER PRO DESKTOP PERCISION SERIES